3/31/08

(Real) Piracy funds terror

This came across my RSS feed this morning.

Piracy, in this case, equals counterfeit products. I think this is a worthy distinction. Diabolical amputation of pinkies indeed...

When we discuss "piracy," I think it's important to discuss it with that distinction in mind. I'm, personally, often not talking about counterfeit handbags, but rather the people in the corner of the creepy flea market on Kishwalkee (sp) Street in Rockford, selling copies of movies not even out yet. A for-profit enterprise...

But no boats, at least in Rockford. Johnny Depp will have to wait for the CGI train to hook up to reality.

Feed: Ars Technica
Posted on: Monday, March 31, 2008 1:12 AM
Author: nate@arstechnica.com (Nate Anderson)
Subject: US Attorney General: Piracy funds terror

The Attorney General gives a speech on intellectual property in which piracy and counterfeiting turn out to fund—wait for it—terrorism. Bet you didn't see that one coming. Fortunately, the AG understands who the pirates really are.


Read More...

University of Texas Student Honor Code Plagiarized?

Heard about this story on NPR this morning. Wow.

Paying for a Download of a "Free" Broadcast

A few weeks ago, I was watching a political show and thought that one of the guest commentators made some interesting remarks. I wrote myself a note to look online for the video later. Several weeks had past before I got to this task, and when I checked the show’s website, the video was moved to an archive page where I would have to pay for the transcript.

I just saw the entire broadcast for “free” on my television set, and I could have recorded the broadcast without any cost per the Audio Home Recording Act--if I understood the reading for this week correctly. Yet, I thought downloading the information online would be quicker, and better yet, accessible. How can companies get away with this? Are they right? Am I wrong?

Links for Tonight's Presentation: Copyright and the Digital Knitting Community

The Internet Knitting Community
Knit Picks Patterns
Green Apples -- A Knitting Blog
Knitting on Impulse
knitalong.net
Fitted Knits Along
Ravelry (subscription required)

Awareness of Copyright
b natural. c sharp (blog post dealing with copyright)
Knitting copyright personal web page

What Knitters Are Saying about Copyright
Ravelry posting (knitter will not share work as often now)
222 pages of Ravelry posts on "copyright" (at 30 posts per page, that's 6,660 posts!)

Copyright Infringement vs Creative Evolution

I’m not sure we can blame the professors of composition courses—who encourage single authorship and emphasize the consequences of plagiarism—for our outlook on copyright. I don’t claim to have a crystal clear understanding of all the aspects that surround and separate copyright, patents, trademarks, etc. (Even Logie points to criticism of Judge Stevens’ use of patent law language in a copyright ruling on p. 133.) What does seem to be clear is the audacity of those who take (or attempt to take) literary, lyrical, and/or digital compositions and pass them off as their own. That act seems very different from those who credit the “original” authors’ work and then add to it to create something new.

Apples and oranges!?

Is the Internet a P2P Network?

I have little to no experience with P2P networks, but Logie struck a cord with me when he implied that the Internet as a whole is essentially P2P file sharing (145). I often attach files, send links to articles and websites, and copy/paste text into other documents such as email. Don’t we do that here on this blog, too? Why can’t the courts see the similarities and rule in favor of the people? They need to force the music and movie corporations to “get with the digital program!”

3/30/08

"free" books still under copyright

Would have posted this under Lynn168's excellent post about LibraVox, but I think this is the other side of the coin. Anyway:

Wowio allows users to download from their collection of ebooks still protected under copyright, with some limitations:
  1. Users must register in order to gain access to their library.
  2. Users are limited to three downloads per day.
  3. Although Wowio claims they feel that "technology-based DRM is essentially a fraud," publishers/content owners may still restrict use of texts via Adobe Reader controls [see Lessig's Free Culture, 148-53]. I'd be willing to bet $10 that some of these controls are exercised on works in the public domain.

So, this is somewhere in between Netflix and a library, which--to me--is great. But I'm not sold enough to give it a try yet. From the FAQ:

Does WOWIO use any kind of digital rights management (DRM)?

Since anyone can defeat the most "sophisticated" DRM with the print screen button, we believe that technology-based DRM is essentially a fraud. Our approach takes the market incentive out of misbehaving, rewards people for doing the right thing, and tries to stay out of the way of honest users.

^ emphasis mine. I like their ethos here, and took note of the morality approach there at the end. But:

To help keep everyone honest, however, readers must authenticate their identity and agree to a licensing agreement when they set up their account. Then, each ebook is serialized with the reader's authenticated name and a unique serial number, as well as other less visible markers. WOWIO will immediately terminate the account of anyone caught illegally distributing ebooks, and will prosecute serious offenders.

Again, emphasis mine. Why not call a spade a spade and just recognize that some of us cannot be trusted? I'm not railing against Wowio--it seems like they have good intentions--but it's clear that somebody, somewhere, has a different definition of "free" than I do, and is worried that this free experiment will run out of control.

In the very next question in the FAQ, Wowio explains their business model that is awfully close to what Lessig and Logie are talking about--basically, that this business model might lead people to go out and buy the print versions.

So what are we to make of this? On one hand, I feel like it's a step in the right direction. I don't mind that it's ad-supported so long as someone isn't trying to sell me another Baconator on page 146 of Cat's Cradle (available on Wowio, actually). And I can see where this distribution method might benefit aspiring authors willing to allow their work to be available for free, as well as established, "I've heard of her but never read any of her stuff" writers.

But on the other hand, why not go all out and slap a CC license on your work? That would get rid of the hassle of signing up (as well as make an end run around those pesky privacy concerns). My guess is that it eliminates the ad revenue from the equation. And we can't have that, now, can we?